Benching Baker doesn't mean it's the end for him

[Baker Backer]

Benching Baker wouldn't be the end of him in Cleveland, at least I don't believe so. It might be a good idea to bench him to protect him for next season. And who knows, maybe Keenum or someone else can help us win these upcoming games. Because Baker isn't doing it with his injuries and other problems. Maybe it's time to take a chance on this season and bench Baker. I hate to say it, but I think it's the right choice right now.

I don't see Baker sitting next week though, which will probably be a bad idea, but we'll see.

 

[DirkDog]

I agree. Him being benched would be a better idea right now, considering he is hurting, he isn't doing much of anything out there, and this team needs someone who can play right now.

The article below discusses this, as they think the Browns did him wrong not sitting him. Do you agree?

Daryl Ruiter: Browns Have Failed Baker Mayfield By Not Sitting Him

92.3 The Fan’s Browns beat reporter Daryl Ruiter believes the Cleveland Browns should have sat Baker Mayfield due to his injuries.

www.brownsnation.com

 

[FridayStar88]

Yeah it doesn't mean he's going to be gone from Cleveland. They may give the guy another year to prove himself, and if not, then they'll have him packing. Or maybe after the first few weeks of the season and go from there.